%0 Journal Article %J Eur J Publ Health %D 2013 %T Using multiple inequality indices to assess changes in social inequalities for breast cancer screening in Belgium %A Françoise Renard %A Stefaan Demarest %A Herman Van Oyen %A Jean Tafforeau %K 2001 %K 2008 %K ALL %K AS %K at %K Attributable %K Belgian %K Belgium %K breast %K breast cancer %K breast cancer screening %K Breast-cancer %K cancer %K cancer screening %K Change %K Changes %K comparing %K contribution %K data %K Educational level %K Educational-level %K Evolution %K Fraction %K Group %K health %K Health inequalities %K health interview survey %K HIS %K identify %K Impact %K index %K inequalities %K inequality %K Interview %K Interview survey %K IS %K LEVEL %K mammographic %K measure %K measures %K measuring %K method %K methods %K Multiple %K national %K national screening %K objectives %K PAF %K period %K POPULATION %K prevalence %K programme %K Ratio %K relative %K Relative index of inequality %K result %K results %K RII %K SCREENING %K slope index %K SOCIAL %K Social inequalities %K Social inequality %K Socio economic %K Socio-economic %K Socioeconomic %K Socioeconomic position %K survey %K uptake %X Objectives: To identify changes in social inequalities for mammograms uptake in Belgium over the period1997-2008 using multiple indices, and to assess the contribution of the national breast cancer screeningprogramme in these changes. Methods: Data were obtained from four waves of the Belgian Health InterviewSurvey. The socio-economic position was defined by the educational level. Inequalities were measured both withpairwise measures comparing extreme educational groups (prevalence difference and prevalence ratio), and withindices measuring the total inequality impact at population level: the Population Attributable Fraction (PAF), theRelative Index of Inequality (RII) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). Results: All indices show a substantialdecrease in inequalities in mammographic uptake between 1997 and 2008. For the indices of total impact (PAF, RII,SII), the change occurred between the first two waves (1997 and 2001) and stabilized afterwards, while forpairwise indices the evolution continued over the whole period. Conclusion: Using multiple indices ofinequality is necessary for a more complete understanding of the changes: total impact inequality indicesshould always complement simple pairwise measures. The inequalities in mammograms uptake, as measuredwith total impact indices, only decreased before the start of the national screening programme %B Eur J Publ Health %V 24 %P 275 - 280 %8 29/7/2013 %G eng %N 2 %1 35764 %& 275 %R http://dx.doi.org/