<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brocchi, E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bergmann, I E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dekker, A</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Paton, D J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sammin, D J</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Greiner, M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Grazioli, S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">De Simone, F</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Yadin, H</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Haas, B</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bulut, N</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Malirat, V</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Neitzert, E</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Goris, N</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Parida, S</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sørensen, K</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kris De Clercq</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Comparative evaluation of six ELISAs for the detection of antibodies to the non-structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vaccine</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vaccine</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Animals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Antibodies, Viral</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Antibody Specificity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Carrier State</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cattle</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Databases, Factual</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Reproducibility of Results</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sheep</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Swine</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vaccination</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Viral Proteins</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2006 Nov 17</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6966-79</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;To validate the use of serology in substantiating freedom from infection after foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) outbreaks have been controlled by measures that include vaccination, 3551 sera were tested with six assays that detect antibodies to the non-structural proteins of FMD virus. The sera came from naïve, vaccinated, infected and vaccinated-and-infected animals; two-thirds from cattle, the remainder from sheep and pigs. The assays were covariant for sensitivity, but not necessarily for specificity. A commercial kit from Cedi-diagnostics and an in-house assay from IZS-Brescia were comparable to the NCPanaftosa-screening index method described in the Diagnostic Manual of the World Animal Health Organisation. Using these three tests the specificity and sensitivity for the detection of carriers in vaccinated cattle approaches or exceeds 99% and 90%, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">47-48</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16753241?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record></records></xml>