TY - JOUR T1 - p16INK4a immunocytochemistry versus human papillomavirus testing for triage of women with minor cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JF - Cancer Cytopathol Y1 - 2012 A1 - Roelens, Jolien A1 - Reuschenbach, Miriam A1 - von Knebel Doeberitz, Magnus A1 - Wentzensen, Nicolas A1 - Bergeron, Christine A1 - M. Arbyn KW - Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia KW - Cervix Uteri KW - Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16 KW - DNA, Viral KW - Female KW - Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests KW - Humans KW - immunohistochemistry KW - Papillomaviridae KW - Sensitivity and Specificity KW - triage KW - Uterine Cervical Neoplasms AB -

The best method for identifying women who have minor cervical lesions that require diagnostic workup remains unclear. The authors of this report performed a meta-analysis to assess the accuracy of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (p16(INK4a)) immunocytochemistry compared with high-risk human papillomavirus DNA testing with Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) to detect grade 2 or greater cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) and CIN3+ among women who had cervical cytology indicating atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) or low-grade cervical lesions (LSIL). A literature search was performed in 3 electronic databases to identify studies that were eligible for this meta-analysis. Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of p16(INK4a) to detect CIN2+ was 83.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.8%-88.2%) and 83.8% (95% CI, 73.5%-90.6%) in ASC-US and LSIL cervical cytology, respectively, and the pooled specificities were 71% (95% CI, 65%-76.4%) and 65.7% (95% CI, 54.2%-75.6%), respectively. Eight studies provided both HC2 and p16(INK4a) triage data. p16(INK4a) and HC2 had similar sensitivity, and p16(INK4a) has significantly higher specificity in the triage of women with ASC-US (relative sensitivity, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.89-1.01]; relative specificity, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.57-2.12]). In the triage of LSIL, p16(INK4a) had significantly lower sensitivity but higher specificity compared with HC2 (relative sensitivity, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.81-0.94]; relative specificity, 2.74 [95% CI, 1.99-3.76]). The published literature indicated the improved accuracy of p16(INK4a) compared with HC2 testing in the triage of women with ASC-US. In LSIL triage, p16(INK4a) was more specific but less sensitive.

VL - 120 CP - 5 U1 - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22700382?dopt=Abstract M3 - 10.1002/cncy.21205 ER -