<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Françoise Renard</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stefaan Demarest</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Herman Van Oyen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jean Tafforeau</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using multiple inequality indices to assess changes in social inequalities for breast cancer screening in Belgium</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eur J Publ Health</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2001</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ALL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">AS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">at</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Attributable</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Belgian</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Belgium</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">breast</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">breast cancer</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">breast cancer screening</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Breast-cancer</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cancer</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cancer screening</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Change</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Changes</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">comparing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">contribution</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">data</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Educational level</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Educational-level</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Evolution</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fraction</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Group</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Health inequalities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health interview survey</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">HIS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">identify</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Impact</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">index</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">inequalities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">inequality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Interview</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Interview survey</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">IS</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LEVEL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">mammographic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">measure</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">measures</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">measuring</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">method</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">methods</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Multiple</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">national</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">national screening</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">objectives</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">PAF</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">period</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">POPULATION</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">prevalence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">programme</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ratio</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">relative</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Relative index of inequality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">result</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">results</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">RII</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SCREENING</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">slope index</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SOCIAL</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social inequalities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Social inequality</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Socio economic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Socio-economic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Socioeconomic</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Socioeconomic position</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">survey</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">uptake</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2013</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29/7/2013</style></date></pub-dates></dates><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">280</style></number><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">24</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">275 - 280</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Objectives: To identify changes in social inequalities for mammograms uptake in Belgium over the period1997-2008 using multiple indices, and to assess the contribution of the national breast cancer screeningprogramme in these changes. Methods: Data were obtained from four waves of the Belgian Health InterviewSurvey. The socio-economic position was defined by the educational level. Inequalities were measured both withpairwise measures comparing extreme educational groups (prevalence difference and prevalence ratio), and withindices measuring the total inequality impact at population level: the Population Attributable Fraction (PAF), theRelative Index of Inequality (RII) and the Slope Index of Inequality (SII). Results: All indices show a substantialdecrease in inequalities in mammographic uptake between 1997 and 2008. For the indices of total impact (PAF, RII,SII), the change occurred between the first two waves (1997 and 2001) and stabilized afterwards, while forpairwise indices the evolution continued over the whole period. Conclusion: Using multiple indices ofinequality is necessary for a more complete understanding of the changes: total impact inequality indicesshould always complement simple pairwise measures. The inequalities in mammograms uptake, as measuredwith total impact indices, only decreased before the start of the national screening programme</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">35764</style></custom1><section><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">275</style></section></record></records></xml>