<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Van de Wiele, Gerlinde</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Teughels, Wim</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vercruyssen, Marjolein</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wim Coucke</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Temmerman, Andy</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Quirynen, Marc</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The accuracy of guided surgery via mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical templates in the hands of surgeons with little experience.</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clin Oral Implants Res</style></secondary-title><alt-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clin Oral Implants Res</style></alt-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Adult</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aged</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clinical Competence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dental Implantation, Endosseous</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Dental Implants</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Female</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Humans</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jaw, Edentulous</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Male</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">middle aged</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mouth Mucosa</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prospective Studies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">SOFTWARE</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Surgery, Computer-Assisted</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Treatment Outcome</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015 Dec</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">26</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1489-94</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;OBJECTIVES: &lt;/b&gt;This prospective study analyzed the accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides, executed by inexperienced surgeons supervised by an experienced colleague.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;MATERIAL AND METHODS: &lt;/b&gt;For the accuracy analysis, 75 OsseoSpeed implants™, placed in 17 fully edentulous jaws (16 patients) using a mucosa-supported stereolithographic guide (IMPLANT SAFE Guide, DENTSPLY Implants) and the Facilitate™ protocol, were included. DICOM images of the pre-surgical planning and the post-surgical CBCT were matched using the Mimics(®) software (Materialise Dental). These data were compared with the data (12 jaws, 52 implants) of an experienced surgeon (Vercruyssen et al. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 2014; doi:10.1111/jcpe.12231).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;RESULTS: &lt;/b&gt;The global deviation at the coronal and apical point was 0.9 mm (SD 0.5) and 1.1 mm (SD 0.5), respectively. Depth deviations were 0.5 mm (SD 0.5) and 1.1 mm (SD 0.5), respectively, and the angular deviation was 2.8° (SD 1.5°). These deviations were statistically not inferior to the deviations of the experienced surgeon and also within the range of deviations reported by several systematic reviews.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;CONCLUSION: &lt;/b&gt;Within the limitations of this study and for the above-mentioned surgical protocol, inexperience of the surgeon had no influence on the accuracy of implant placement in fully edentulous jaws, when all steps needed for the procedure are supervised by experienced dentists.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">12</style></issue><custom1><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25318961?dopt=Abstract</style></custom1></record></records></xml>