<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Eric Deconinck</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michaël Canfyn</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Céline Duchateau</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">De Braekeleer, Kris</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Response to letter to the editor: “Comments on ‘discrepancies between validated GC‐FID and UHPLC‐DAD methods for the analysis of Δ‐9‐THC and CBD in dried hemp flowers’”</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Drug Testing and Analysis</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CBD</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">delta-9-THC</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">dried hemp flowers</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2023</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jan-02-2023</style></date></pub-dates></dates><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">15</style></volume><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2</style></issue></record></records></xml>